It’s another AMD victory, but the R7 265’s mediocre minimum framerates mean you’ll still notice occasional stutters during more intensive moments. Nvidia’s hardware still languished with a minimum framerate of 10.2fps, but the AMD card slipped to a 16.38fps minimum – you’ll notice both cards slip during demanding moments. We cranked the detail up to Ultra and both cards remained playable: the R7 265 hit 60.1fps, with the Nvidia at 46.34fps. Its minimum framerate of 10.2fps is poor and, while that’s just a momentarily lapse in smoothness, that judder will be jarring during gameplay. The R7 265’s minimum of 30fps means the game will be smooth at every moment, which is more than we can say for Nvidia. GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 265 in Bioshock InfiniteĪMD continued its good form in Bioshock Infinite – a modern game that’s very scalable, in part thanks to its console-friendly development.Īt Very High settings both cards had no trouble, but the R7 265 led the way with an average of 70.8fps to the GTX 750 Ti’s 65.2fps. It’s no surprise AMD took an early lead – Battlefield 4 is a flagship title from AMD’s in-house gaming programme, so the firm’s engineers will have visited DICE and optimised the game for Radeon cards. The AMD card’s better minimum framerate result is of particular importance, as it means the game won’t judder mid-game. AMD’s 29fps minimum was only one frame short of a playable 30fps – the Nvidia card was five frames worse – and the R7 265 hit an average of 34.33fps, which was four frames better than the GTX 750 Ti. The gap closed at Ultra quality, but the red team still dominated. In the High-quality benchmark the AMD’s minimum and average framerates of 46fps and 53.66fps easily bested Nvidia – the former figure was nine frames ahead, and the latter was almost seven frames faster. There was only one winner in Battlefield 4. Looking to spend more? Try our Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 770 comparison GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 265 in Battlefield 4 We’ve also measured idle and peak temperatures, and the idle and peak power requirements of our test rig, which comprises of an Asus X79-Deluxe motherboard, Intel Core i7-4960X processor, 16GB of RAM and a 1TB hard disk. Both cards were only tested at quoted speeds if they remained stable throughout all tests. GPU overclocking is easier than ever, so we’ve given both of these cards a boost. We’ve loaded 3DMark’s Ice Storm, Cloud Gate and Fire Strike benchmarks to determine each card’s theoretical power, and we’ve locked and loaded the Unigine Heaven test to further evaluate raw power.Ĭinebench R15’s OpenGL benchmark tests each card’s abilities with GPU-heavy workloads, and PC Mark 8 uses Home and Creative workload benchmarks to judge application performance. We’ve run Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Batman: Arkham Origins and Crysis 3 at their most demanding settings and 1,920 x 1,080. AMD’s cards are rarer, and a stock-speed model costs at least £124 GTX 750 Ti cards are more numerous and cost at least £114 for a stock design. Little separates these cards at the checkout. The AMD card’s stock and boost speeds of 900MHz and 925MHz can’t match Nvidia, but its 2GB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1,400MHz – and it’s got 1,024 stream processors and 2.8 billion transistors. The GTX 750 Ti trades blows with the AMD Radeon R7 265, which is a boosted version of the Pitcairn core used in last year’s £200 Radeon HD 7850. It’s got 640 stream processors and 1.87 billion transistors. The GTX 750 Ti is clocked to 1,020MHz with an average boost of 1,085MHz, and it’s paired with 2GB of 1,350MHz GDDR5 memory. You may also like our Best SSD group test Nvidia’s done this by redesigning its streaming multiprocessors: instead of using huge blocks of processors, Maxwell divides them into much smaller chunks that can be deployed more efficiently. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses the new Maxwell architecture, which is designed to produce great framerates while drastically reducing power consumption. That’s great news for the rest of us because, these days, high-quality single-screen gaming doesn’t cost much more than £100.ĪMD and Nvidia have launched two new cards into this competitive market segment. GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 265 reviewĮnthusiast GPUs are so powerful that only those with 4K screens or multiple monitors need to worry about spending hundreds on the latest cards.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |